Go to content

Rina Paul - Novel Insights

Skip menu
     E-ISSN: 3048-6572     
   P-ISSN: 3049-1991    
DOI Prefix: 10.69655
Skip menu
Volume-II, Special Issue, March 2026
Novel Insights
A Peer-Reviewed Quarterly Multidisciplinary Research Journal
Volume-II, Special Issue, March 2026
The Ethical Difference Between Active and Passive Euthanasia: A Comparative Discussion
Rina Paul, Independent Research Scholar, Berhampore, West Bengal, India
Email: Rina.paul.93@gmail.com
Received: 22.03.2026
Accepted: 24.03.2026
Published Online: 31.03.2026
Page No: 124-129
DOI: 10.69655/novelinsights.vol.2.issue.specialW.96
Abstract
According to utilitarianism, the act that brings more happiness or pleasure than suffering is good. Euthanasia therefore reduces human suffering and at the same time provides stability to the family. Professor Peter Singer has spoken about Preference utilitarianism in this context. We have a right to life, which allows the person concerned to live according to his decisions. Now if a severely mentally ill person decides to euthanize, then we should help him by respecting his individuality. The only difference between these two types of euthanasia is that in active euthanasia, the act is done intentionally, but in passive euthanasia, death is not caused intentionally. Euthanasia is often compared to murder. There are different interpretations of euthanasia and I have discussed here what kind of euthanasia is acceptable.

Keywords: suffering, kill, medical science, live, right to die, euthanasia.


Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur.
Made with WebSite X5.
About us
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent arcu metus, suscipit rhoncus tincidunt vehicula, fermentum ac turpis.
Our address:
Uttarsuri
Roynagar, Karimganj, Assam, 788711
+919101232388
Contact
+ 01(0) 123 45678
info@example.com
Designed by: Dr. Bishwajit Bhattacharjee
(C) Reserved, Uttarsuri, 2025
Novel Insights
A Peer-Reviewed Quarterly Multidisciplinary Research Journal
Back to content